|
Elite
endurance athletes around the world train at high altitude
to try to improve performance. Assuming you are a serious
runner, should you train at altitude? To help determine
whether high-altitude training is right for you, consider
the following questions and the answers that follow.
What
are the physiological adaptations to living at altitude?
There
are both positive and negative adaptations to living at
altitude:
-
Living
at altitude causes increased EPO levels which leads to
increased red blood cell mass. This is a very positive
adaptation.
-
Living
at altitude causes ventilatory acclimatization
(increased breathing), which is a fairly minor
negative adaptation (breathing muscles use oxygen).
-
Living
at altitude causes changes in blood and muscle
buffering capacity, which may be positive or negative.
-
The
degree of performance improvement from altitude
training depends on the ratio of positive to negative
adaptations. The challenge is to manage the exposure
to altitude to maximize the net benefit.
Why
live high and train low?
-
If
an athlete can do the same absolute amount of work at
altitude, then training at altitude should lead to an
improvement in performance. If, as is generally the
case, training intensity is reduced at altitude, then
performance may decrease from altitude training.
-
Studies
have found that living at high altitude and training
at low altitude (live high/train low) leads to
increased performance, increased red blood cell mass
and increased VO2 max.
-
Another
option is the high/high/low model (live high, do low
and moderate intensity training high, and high
intensity training low), which is as beneficial as the
live high/train low model, and transport logistics are
reduced.
How
do EPO and red blood cell mass respond to living high and
training low?
-
Increases
in EPO lead to increases in red blood cell mass, but
the relationship is not linear.
-
Peak
EPO level is reached after two to three days altitude
exposure and tends to gradually return to baseline
after about 25 to 28 days living at altitude.
-
The
percent increase in EPO level appears to be more
important than the absolute increase in EPO in
stimulating increases in red blood cells.
-
When
athletes return to sea level, EPO level is suppressed
and red blood cell mass gradually declines.
-
Red
blood cell mass does not increase for approximately 10
days after EPO increases.
-
If
you cannot measure EPO directly, then measuring
reticulocytes (immature red blood cells) provides an
indication of the EPO response.
What
about iron levels?
-
Athletes
should have a blood test 6 weeks before starting
altitude training. If serum ferritin is less than 30
ug/l for women or 40 ug/l for men, then increase
dietary iron and supplement to increase ferritin prior
to altitude exposure. Otherwise, red blood cell
response will be reduced.
-
If
serum ferritin is low, the athlete may still get an
increase in reticulocytes after altitude exposure, but
they will have low hemoglobin content , and may not
mature into red blood cells.
-
U.S.
Olympic Training Centre supplementation prescription
to increase ferritin is 120 to 130 mg of “elemental
iron” per day, divided into 2 doses, taken with
vitamin C. Take iron supplements 30 min before or 60
min after meals to increase absorption and decrease
gastrointestinal distress.
What
is the difference between athletes who respond to altitude
and those who do not?
There
is a large amount of variability between athletes in
response to living at altitude. Some have much larger
increases in EPO than others at a given elevation.
Athletes who have a low EPO response may need to live at
higher altitude. The reasons for variability are probably
genetic.
|
|
Responders
|
Non-responders
|
|
+
in EPO at peak
|
>50%
|
<30%
|
|
Duration
of EPO peak
|
Prolonged
|
Short
|
|
+
in RBC mass
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
+
in VO2 max
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
-
in training intensity at altitude
|
Slight
|
Larger
|
When
should an athlete add altitude to the training plan?
Altitude
should be treated as a component within a training plan,
similar to other variables such as training volume,
mechanics, speed, skill, etc. Altitude should be added to
an athlete’s training plan either:
-
Classic
model: before a major competition in the peak
phase of training, or
-
Pre-high
intensity phase model: at the end of a
base-building phase. just prior to high-intensity
training. Increased oxygen carrying capacity allows
higher intensity training and quicker recovery for an
increased training stimulus, so the performance
increase outlasts the life of the red blood cells.
Using this model, the benefits of altitude training
last approximately 4 to 6 weeks after returning to sea
level.
What
about simulated altitude?
-
It
is unclear whether there is a difference between the
physiological response to normobaric hypoxia (e.g.
altitude tents or hypoxicator) and hypobaric hypoxia
(e.g. living in the mountains).
-
Use
of altitude houses has been found to produce
significant increases in serum EPO, reticulocyte
count, red blood cell mass, and hemoglobin.
-
Altitude
tents should provide the same stimulus as altitude
houses if hours of exposure are similar.
-
More
scientific data is required about intermittent hypoxic
training (e.g. hypoxicator.
What
is the optimal "dose" of altitude?
-
Think
of altitude as a drug with a dose-response curve. You
need to maximize the benefit and minimize the side
effects.
-
If
an athlete lives too low, then the EPO response is
insufficient to substantially increase red blood cell
mass. If an athlete lives too high, then may
experience excessive ventilatory acclimatization, and
other negative side effects.
-
There
is both scientific and anecdotal evidence that 2,000
to 2,500 meters is the optimal altitude range for many
athletes.
Related
article:
Iron for
runners
Credits:
Text copyright © 2004 by Pete Pfitzinger
Pete Pfitzinger is an exercise physiologist with over 20 years of coaching experience, Pete adheres to the principle that every runner is unique and that training programs must be tailored to the athlete's individual strengths and weaknesses.
For more articles by Pete Pfitzinger, access: http://www.pfitzinger.com
or www.distancecoach.com
|